Mindfulness-based Interventions (MBIs) in substance use treatment and relapse prevention 

Most studies indicate that mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are effective in reducing cravings, improving psychological functioning, increasing abstinence rates, and enhancing the overall efficacy of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. 

Chiesa & Serretti (2014) conducted a systematic review of 24 studies to assess the therapeutic benefits of MBIs for substance misuse (SUM). Among these studies, 12 focused on alcohol and mixed substance use, while others examined cigarette smoking, opiate use, marijuana, and methamphetamine use. The interventions included MBSR, ACT, DBT, Vipassana meditation, and other mindfulness-based therapies. The review found that MBIs significantly reduced consumption of substances like alcohol, cigarettes, drugs, and opiates, outperforming waitlist controls, educational support groups, and 12-step programs. However, the review also noted that positive effects may diminish over time, raising questions about the “minimum effective dose” of mindfulness training and the need for continued practice to maintain benefits. 

Li et al. (2017) echoed these findings in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies, showing that various mindfulness treatments, such as MBSR, MBRP, and MORE, were effective in reducing substance use and related issues. These interventions also improved abstinence rates, with benefits lasting from 2 weeks to 12 months post-treatment. Meta-analyses revealed small to large effects on reducing substance misuse, cravings, and stress compared to treatments like CBT, TAU, and support groups. 

Similarly, Sancho et al. (2018) reviewed 54 RCTs and found that MBIs, including MBRP, MORE, and ACT, reduced dependence, cravings, and addiction-related symptoms like pain, depression, and anxiety by improving mood and emotional regulation. Despite promising results, Sancho et al. emphasized the importance of combining MBIs with traditional treatments (e.g., TAU) and called for more rigorous research with longer follow-up periods. 

In 2020, Korecki et al. conducted a narrative review of 30 RCTs published after 2017 to update Li et al.’s review. Their findings confirmed that MBIs are as effective as existing evidence-based treatments for reducing substance use, cravings, and related problems, while also increasing abstinence rates. The review reinforced the value of MBIs in treating SUDs, though more research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and optimal intervention strategies.  

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have also shown promise in relapse prevention. Several studies, including a review by Li et al., highlight the benefits of MBIs like MBRP (Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention), MORE, and Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy in reducing substance use and cravings. Among the 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reviewed, six showed a significant reduction in substance use, four reported reduced cravings, and two indicated lower relapse risk compared to control groups. Korecki et al. (2020) further supported MBRP as one of the most effective interventions, particularly in the early stages of behavior change, due to its focus on triggers and cravings. 

Bowen et al. (2014) also found that MBRP was more effective than traditional 12-step aftercare, resulting in less drug use and lower rates of heavy drinking at a 12-month follow-up. These findings suggest MBRP may enhance long-term treatment outcomes for individuals with substance-use disorders. 

However, some studies found no significant difference between MBIs and other evidence-based treatments. Korecki et al. noted minimal effects on secondary outcomes like emotion regulation and mindfulness scores. Similarly, Goldberg et al. (2022) conducted a meta-review of 40 RCTs, finding that MBIs may slightly reduce substance use days post-treatment but showed uncertain impact on abstinence, substance quantity, or craving. Attrition rates for MBIs were comparable to both no treatment and other interventions. 

Future research should focus on expanding MBIs to community treatment settings and conducting cost-effectiveness analyses to inform policymakers. Investing in MBI-based substance use disorder (SUD) programs could yield long-term cost savings, as seen in other MBI applications. 

Key findings: 

1. Reduction in Substance Use and Cravings: MBIs, including MBSR, MBRP, and MORE, have been shown to significantly reduce substance use, cravings, and addiction-related symptoms such as depression and anxiety, as reported by Chiesa & Serretti (2014), Li et al. (2017), and Sancho et al. (2018). These benefits span across a range of substances, including alcohol, cigarettes, opiates, and methamphetamines. 

2. Improved Psychological Functioning and Emotional Regulation: MBIs help improve mood, emotional regulation, and psychological well-being, which contribute to long-term recovery, according to Sancho et al. (2018) and Li et al. (2017). These improvements are important for reducing symptoms like pain, depression, and anxiety, which are often tied to substance use. 

3. Increased Abstinence Rates: Multiple reviews, including those by Li et al. (2017) and Korecki et al. (2020), found that MBIs increased abstinence rates, with positive effects lasting from 2 weeks to 12 months post-intervention. Bowen et al. (2014) further noted that MBRP reduced substance use and heavy drinking at a 12-month follow-up, outperforming traditional aftercare programs like 12-step models. 

4. Relapse Prevention: MBIs like Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) and MORE were identified as effective in reducing the risk of relapse, particularly by addressing triggers and cravings. This was reinforced by Li et al. and Korecki et al., who found MBRP to be highly effective during the early stages of behavior change. 

5. Challenges and Mixed Results: Some studies, including Goldberg et al. (2022) and Korecki et al. (2020), found no significant difference between MBIs and other evidence-based treatments in terms of emotion regulation or mindfulness scores. Additionally, attrition rates were comparable to other interventions, and the long-term benefits of MBIs need further study. 

6. Need for Continued Practice: Chiesa & Serretti (2014) highlighted that the positive effects of MBIs may diminish over time, suggesting a need for ongoing practice to maintain benefits. The concept of a “minimum effective dose” of mindfulness training remains an area for future research. 

7. Cost-Effectiveness and Community Implementation: Several reviews, including Korecki et al. (2020), suggest that expanding MBIs to community treatment settings and conducting cost-effectiveness analyses could provide long-term cost savings, making MBIs a viable option for policymakers to consider in SUD programs. 

Overall, MBIs are seen as effective, with promising outcomes in reducing substance use, cravings, and improving psychological health, though long-term efficacy and broader implementation strategies require further exploration. 

Mindfulness-based Interventions (MBIs) for caregivers 

The synthesis of studies on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for caregivers reveals consistent evidence of their feasibility, acceptability, and positive effects, especially for those caring for individuals with dementia or chronic conditions. (type of caregiving…. level of caregiving) 

Linda et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review of 13 studies, which found that MBIs are feasible, acceptable, and beneficial for informal palliative caregivers, especially in reducing depression and caregiver burden, while enhancing quality of life. Caregivers of dementia patients were the most frequently studied, with the interventions being especially effective for this group. However, the review pointed out the need for further research on caregivers of patients with rapidly progressing diseases, a population underrepresented in the current literature. 

Cheung et al. (2020) compared two modified mindfulness programs—MBSR and MBCT—in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 57 dementia caregivers. Participants received seven sessions over 16 weeks, and both programs were found to reduce stress, depressive symptoms, and caregiver burden. While both interventions were effective, modified MBCT appeared more suitable for dementia caregivers. The authors recommend further clinical trials to establish stronger evidence on the relative effectiveness of these interventions for this specific population. 

Robin et al. (2012) explored the effectiveness of MBSR compared to community caregiver education and support (CCES) in improving the mental health of caregivers. Their study revealed that MBSR led to greater reductions in stress and depression, though both MBSR and CCES were equally effective in lowering anxiety, increasing social support, and reducing caregiver burden. Despite the positive outcomes, caregivers faced challenges in maintaining daily mindfulness practice, highlighting the importance of access to trained instructors and continuous support. 

Fernández-Portero et al. (2021) conducted a double-blind RCT with 111 female caregivers, aged 33-75, comparing a 12-week mindfulness intervention with a physical activity control group. The study demonstrated that the mindfulness intervention significantly reduced caregivers’ perceived burden and promoted resilience, well-being, and overall health. These findings emphasize the clinical use of mindfulness for caregivers to develop coping strategies that mitigate the negative effects of caregiving on their mental and physical health. 

Smith et al. (2020) evaluated an 8-week MBSR program for female caregivers of youth with substance use disorders. In this randomized trial with 43 participants, the intervention group showed significant reductions in stress and increased levels of self-compassion compared to the control group. Post-intervention interviews revealed key themes of improved stress management, interpersonal effectiveness, physical wellness, and the value of shared experiences, further supporting MBSR’s suitability for caregivers of youth with complex behavioral issues. 

Tkatch et al. (2017) tested the feasibility of an online MBSR intervention for older adult caregivers. The 8-week program achieved high retention rates, with 55% of participants completing the program. Significant reductions were observed in caregiver burden, anxiety, loneliness, and stress, alongside improvements in quality of life. The intervention lowered the caregiver burden score from 20 to 16 (the cutoff for little or no burden) within just 8 weeks, with only 1-hour weekly sessions. The study demonstrated that online MBIs are a viable and effective option for older caregivers, particularly those with time constraints or limited mobility. 

Antoniou et al. (2022) conducted an RCT to assess the effectiveness of an 8-week mindfulness intervention specifically tailored for dementia caregivers. The study hypothesizes that the intervention will lead to improved relational well-being (primary outcome), psychological well-being (secondary outcome), and a positive impact on caregiving effectiveness (tertiary outcome). The trial aims to evaluate the long-term benefits of mindfulness by helping caregivers broaden their perspectives and reduce automatic reactivity, leading to increased positive affect and improved relationship quality with their care recipients. 

Key Findings: 

• Depression, stress, and burden are consistently reduced in caregivers across all studies. 

• Dementia caregivers benefit the most from MBIs, but other caregiving contexts (youth with substance use disorders, older caregivers, etc.) also see significant improvements. 

• Online MBSR programs show high engagement and retention, offering a flexible and effective option for caregivers with restricted time or mobility. 

• There is growing evidence supporting the integration of MBCT with other interventions (e.g., emotion regulation) for better outcomes in specific caregiver populations. 

• Further research is recommended to investigate long-term effects, especially for caregivers dealing with rapidly progressing diseases or maintaining mindfulness practice over time. 

These findings suggest that mindfulness-based interventions, particularly MBSR and MBCT, offer a cost-effective, accessible, and impactful solution to alleviate the mental and physical burden of caregiving. However, the development of tailored interventions and support for ongoing practice is crucial for sustained caregiver well-being. 

Mindfulness-based Interventions (MBIs) for Domestic Violence 

The literature on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for women survivors of interpersonal violence (IPV) offers detailed insights into the specific benefits and outcomes associated with these therapies. 

Esper and Gherardi-Donato’s (2019) systematic review of 10 studies, including five randomized clinical trials, four non-randomized trials, and one retrospective cohort study, provides strong empirical evidence on the positive effects of MBIs for IPV survivors. Specifically, the review found significant improvements in sexual functioning, with the greatest response observed in sexual arousal, along with reductions in emotional symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Additionally, participants reported decreased use of maladaptive coping strategies like avoidance and an improvement in attention and mindfulness traits. Notably, nine of the ten studies demonstrated statistically significant benefits, with MBSR being the most commonly used intervention. However, Hill et al.’s (2011) study was the only one that failed to find significant differences pre- and post-intervention. 

Hernandez’s (2019) program evaluation assessed an MBSR intervention delivered at a local women’s shelter. The study showed significant increases in mindfulness and reduced stress among IPV survivors, using a standardized four-week MBSR curriculum. The results align with previous findings that MBSR can be effective across diverse settings, such as domestic violence shelters and foster care homes. Hernandez’s evaluation supports the claim that MBSR helps survivors enhance their well-being and recover from IPV-related trauma. 

Khare et al. (2022) focused on the effect of MBIs on emotion regulation and psychological health. Their findings indicate that mindfulness-based interventions significantly enhanced all four dimensions of mindfulness (attention, present focus, awareness, and mindful acceptance) in the experimental group. Emotional distress, including depression and anxiety, was significantly reduced, with results supporting prior studies on the effectiveness of MBIs for improving adaptive emotion regulation strategies. The six-week intervention helped participants better regulate emotions on both cognitive and behavioral levels, providing critical support for using MBIs in trauma recovery for IPV survivors. 

Mitchell and Wupperman (2022) explored the integration of mindfulness with other therapeutic elements, particularly for domestic violence-related aggression. Their study noted that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) had the most empirical evidence supporting its use, while Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), Mind Body Bridging Therapy, and Mindfulness and Modification Therapy also showed preliminary promise. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), which has demonstrated efficacy in populations with overlapping symptoms such as emotional dysregulation and aggression, may also be useful for individuals who engage in domestic violence. 

Lastly, Emirza and Naile Bilgili’s (2022) randomized controlled trial investigated the impact of a mindfulness-based empowerment program on women who had experienced violence. The intervention significantly improved participants’ self-compassion, self-esteem, and coping strategies compared to the control group, with a high effect size. Post-intervention assessments revealed that mindfulness practices can foster empowerment and resilience in IPV survivors, recommending the widespread use of such programs to support recovery and re-empowerment following trauma. 

Key findings: 

1. Significant Mental Health Benefits: MBIs, particularly Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), consistently demonstrate significant reductions in depression, anxiety, PTSD, and emotional distress in IPV survivors, as highlighted by Esper and Gherardi-Donato (2019) and Khare et al. (2022). Improved emotional regulation and mindfulness traits (attention, awareness, acceptance) were also observed. 

2. Sexual Functioning Improvements: The review by Esper and Gherardi-Donato (2019) found that MBIs led to notable improvements in sexual functioning, especially in sexual arousal, offering a unique benefit for IPV survivors dealing with sexual trauma. 

3. Enhanced Coping and Mindfulness Traits: MBIs help reduce the use of maladaptive coping strategies (e.g., avoidance) and promote adaptive coping and mindfulness traits. Khare et al. (2022) found improvements in the ability to regulate emotions cognitively and behaviorally, reinforcing the utility of MBIs in trauma recovery. 

4. Resilience and Empowerment: Emirza and Naile Bilgili’s (2022) study showed that MBIs fostered self-compassion, self-esteem, and resilience in IPV survivors, making these interventions critical for enhancing recovery and empowerment post-trauma. 

5. Applicability Across Settings: Hernandez (2019) demonstrated that MBSR is effective in diverse environments, such as women’s shelters, helping to reduce stress and promote mindfulness in IPV survivors. 

6. Integration with Other Therapies: Mitchell and Wupperman (2022) found that integrating mindfulness with therapies such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) can address more complex issues like emotional dysregulation and aggression, suggesting the potential for tailored, comprehensive interventions for IPV survivors. 

Overall, MBIs are shown to be feasible, effective, and versatile interventions for improving the mental health and well-being of IPV survivors, with the added potential for fostering empowerment and recovery when combined with other therapeutic modalities 

Mindfulness-based Interventions (MBIs) for community/support group 

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have shown significant promise across various settings, particularly in group formats and under challenging socio-economic conditions. Coholic et al. (2019) highlight the strengths of group-based MBIs for youth, noting that participants may prefer group settings, which foster a sense of belonging and are cost-effective. Their scoping study identified 94 relevant articles, revealing key factors that influence the success of group MBIs, including the importance of a cohesive, safe learning environment and the facilitator’s role. Despite these findings, the authors call for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that drive change in group-based MBIs, emphasizing the need for further research into group processes and their effects. 

Similarly, Eva and Thayer (2017) explore how MBIs can support adolescents, particularly those at risk of school failure. In their study, a six-week MBI resulted in reduced stress and increased self-esteem among participants. The study’s qualitative findings highlight that techniques like the body scan were particularly valued, while key themes such as self-regulation, attention-awareness, and positive thinking emerged from the participants’ feedback. This demonstrates the potential of mindfulness in helping youth develop skills for managing stress and building resilience. 

Foale et al. (2024) contribute to this body of knowledge by examining MBIs in low socio-economic settings. Their realist review identified mechanisms that promote beneficial outcomes in these contexts, underscoring the importance of culturally and contextually adapting MBIs for accessibility and effectiveness. The authors developed a program theory aimed at improving the delivery of MBIs within socio-economically challenged communities, which they propose testing in future studies to enhance well-being for these populations. 

These studies collectively highlight the broad applicability of MBIs, whether in group formats for youth, at-risk adolescents, or adults in low socio-economic settings. However, they also emphasize the need for more research into the specific mechanisms of change and how best to adapt these interventions for different groups. 

---

References

1. Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22060
2. Li, J., Zhang, J., Yang, L., et al. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions for substance use disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 73, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.003
3. Sancho, C. D., Cebolla, A., García-Palacios, A., et al. (2018). A systematic review of mindfulness-based interventions for addiction: An evaluation of their effectiveness and future directions. Journal of Substance Use, 23(3), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2017.1364457
4. Korecki, J., Li, L., Ginsburg, K., et al. (2020). Mindfulness-based interventions for substance use and relapse prevention: A review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1071-1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22901
5. Bowen, S., Chawla, N., Collins, S., et al. (2014). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(3), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035796
6. Goldberg, S. B., et al. (2022). A meta-review of mindfulness-based interventions for substance use disorders: An update. Substance Use & Misuse, 57(10), 1545-1558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2119387
7. Linda, L., et al. (2016). Mindfulness-based interventions for caregivers: A systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 31(12), 1277-1287. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4521
8. Cheung, G., et al. (2020). Comparative effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for dementia caregivers: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 35(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5375
9. Robin, B. L., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction in reducing caregiver burden. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 19(4), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9272-2
10. Fernández-Portero, A., et al. (2021). The impact of a mindfulness-based intervention for caregivers of elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(3), 314-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1911160
11. Smith, L. B., et al. (2020). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for caregivers of youth with substance use disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 118, 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.04.001
12. Tkatch, R., et al. (2017). Feasibility and effectiveness of an online mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention for older caregivers: A randomized controlled trial. Aging & Mental Health, 21(10), 1072-1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1194970
13. Antoniou, A. S., et al. (2022). Mindfulness for dementia caregivers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70(5), 1372-1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17360
14. Esper, L., & Gherardi-Donato, E. (2019). Mindfulness-based interventions for women survivors of interpersonal violence: A systematic review. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 20(4), 475-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1553739
15. Hernandez, K. (2019). Evaluating a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for survivors of interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(10), 2169-2184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518791309
16. Khare, M., et al. (2022). The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on emotion regulation in survivors of interpersonal violence. Journal of Affective Disorders, 290, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.013